Your mess for less. You can’t outsource accountability… June 30, 2010
Posted by Mark Hillary in IT Services, Outsourcing.Tags: accountability, america, BP, contractor, disaster, gulf, oil, Outsourcing, procurement, responsibility, slick, spill, USA
trackback
If you are procuring post-it notes from another firm, you agree on the price, quality, and amount of items, then you procure them. That’s the end of the relationship, except for those annoying stationery catalogues that will be sent for evermore.
So why is this subtle difference so important? Take a look at the environmental disaster now playing out off the southern coast of the USA. Oil giant BP is being blamed for allowing a rig explosion and subsequent oil leak to spiral out of control to the point where some are even questioning the viability of the company – regardless of their assets and heritage in the oil industry.
Nobody cares if people on the BP payroll made the mistakes or not. If BP hired a supplier then the buck stops with BP. This is an important point to remember if you are considering the use of outsourcing as a way of sorting out a messy or disorganised business function. The supplier might sell ‘your mess for less’, but the mistakes will still be your problem when they occur – both in terms of actual liability and reputation.
Very true. Confusion starts, when it is impossible to define accountability due to vaguely defined contracts. I fully agree that the company outsourcing service should be held liable for any consequences, from envirnmental disaster (BD oil spill) to sensitive data leaks in IT, finance, and medical services. If it is legally not possible to outsource accountability, it makes little sense to give up control.
[...] and their employees, accountable. I read a blogpost last month that makes this point well: you can’t outsource this mess. Various accounts of the disaster make it clear that BP’s lack of accountability in the corporate [...]